Session 237
Thursday, 9 July 2026 | 16:00–16:45 (UTC+02:00) | Room E, Palexpo
Learn more and register here
About
In December 2025, in their statement on the WSIS+20 Outcome Declaration, the G77 expressed regret that the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR) had not been explicitly invoked in the document. In the bloc’s view, this omission weakened the development aspect of WSIS implementation, ignoring the “structural disparities in capacities and resources among countries.” The origin of the principle of CBDR lies in the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Climate responsibilities are “common” because climate change is a global issue that affects the Earth’s ecosystem in its entirety. All states, therefore, share a collective obligation to protect the planet. However, these responsibilities are “differentiated” based on historical emissions and economic capabilities. Developing countries have also argued for the CBDR principle outside the climate change agenda – including in the Convention on Biological Diversity and in discussions on Financing for Development.
It is this precedent and the sentiment expressed by the G77 in December 2025 that this session hopes to build on in order to enrich the global digital governance debate. The focus of this session is on what it means to meaningfully translate the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities in the current conjuncture for a reinvigorated global digital governance paradigm. As the UN Secretary General has noted on several occasions, AI is truly a global technology – its value chains are interdependent, and its development and deployment have the potential to impact, for better or worse, the common future of the people and the planet. Yet, this common concern notwithstanding, the historical evolution of digital technologies also reflects structural exclusions that impede digital equity and prevent developing countries from participating in, and benefiting from, the digital revolution on equal terms. Today, CBDR in international digital cooperation may just be an analogy, but today’s analogy is tomorrow’s constitutionalism.
From this starting point, the session will take up the following questions:
- What does it mean to apply the CBDR principle to international digital cooperation? What could be some illustrative, core dimensions?
- Since the application of the CBDR principle in the digital arena may face difficulties in a fragmented geopolitical context, is it possible to take up a few specific issues as starting points for agreement internationally?
- How can existing forums (multilateral, plurilateral, regional, etc.) be used to mobilize consensus for this new discourse?
Speakers:
H.E. Ms. Amb. Erika Almeida Watanabe Patriota | Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of Brazil to the WTO
Dr. Alison Gillwald | Founding Director and Distinguished Fellow, Research ICT Africa, South Africa
Mr. Danish | Programme Officer, Sustainable Development and Climate Change Programme, South Centre, Geneva
Ms. Anriette Esterhuysen | Senior advisor on global and regional internet governance, Association for Progressive Communications, South Africa
Moderator
Ms. Nandini Chami | Deputy Director and Fellow – Research and Policy Engagement, IT for Change, India